By Bill Ferguson
In early April, luminaries from corporate America,
Wall Street and regulatory agencies met in Washington,
D.C. to discuss the burdens facing executives and
directors in today’s post-Sarbanes Oxley Compliance
(SOX) world. Warren Buffet lamented that managers
and directors are spending so much time and energy
focused on regulatory process. “We’re doing a lot
of things that I regard as unnecessary. Sarbanes-Oxley
has changed the complexion of things that go on
in our boardroom. It detracts from more important
board issues,” he says.
Certainly, times have changed for directors of United
States companies. Serving on the board of a public
company entails more exposure and liability than
ever before. While some executives and directors
rail against the new restrictions, investor advocates
praise the new level of scrutiny placed on company
leaders and cite recent outsized CEO termination
payments and accounting scandals as evidence that
many boards remain derelict in their duties to shareholders.
Despite some protests, many boards are now turning
their attention toward ensuring that management
has the right strategy in place for long-term growth.
One of the most significant changes seen among our
clients is a renewed focus by directors on company
strategy. In FPL Associates’ report
Leading the Enterprise 2007, a study of over 150
top executives and board members across the real
estate and related industries, top board issues
in 2007 were corporate performance and oversight
of strategy. The most important concern is creating
shareholder value.
However, boards are closely watching executive compensation
and compliance with new reporting standards. Interestingly,
executives generally rank these matters higher than
directors, illustrating the scrutiny regarding their
compensation in today’s environment.
This is particularly true among REITs because reporting
requirements for executive compensation practices
among public companies have been recently expanded.
As boards focus more on their companies’ long-term
strategies, they’re also spending more time addressing
CEO succession planning and CEO/board relations.
Directors are becoming more actively involved with
the formation of close partnerships with management
and the preservation of continuity among company
leadership.
While companies are handling new governance requirements
and regulatory issues, there’s an expectation that
directors will be required to dedicate a significant
amount of time to preparing for and attending meetings.
Real estate industry experience is highly valued,
as directors are expected to take a more active
role in shaping strategy.
Companies across the real estate industry are committed
to bringing women and minorities onto the board.
Interestingly, many public REITs are particularly
dedicated to diversity, especially those in the
retail, multifamily, hospitality and senior housing
sectors. These companies are generally characterized
by highly diverse employee populations as well as
diverse customer bases, making diversity at the
board level particularly important.
Clearly, board priorities are shifting. While Congress
continues to address compliance and governance issues,
directors themselves are beginning to return their
focus to where many would argue it belongs: on strategy,
growth and value creation for shareholders.
| Most Critical Issues for REIT
Boards in 2007 |
Issue
|
Average
Score (1 to 5 scale) |
All
REIT
Respondents |
REIT
Executives |
REIT
Directors |
| CEO succession |
3.41 |
3.51 |
3.33 |
| CEO/board relations |
3.73 |
3.74 |
3.67 |
| Change of control |
2.73 |
2.95 |
1.83 |
| Executive compensation |
4.20 |
4.26 |
3.83 |
| Corporate governance/corporate accountability |
3.98 |
4.00 |
3.83 |
| Corporate performance |
4.64 |
4.67 |
4.50 |
| Federal & state regulation |
2.18 |
2.18 |
2.17 |
| Liability insurance |
2.36 |
2.39 |
2.17 |
| Director nomination/succession |
3.18 |
3.21 |
3.00 |
| Relations with shareholders |
3.30 |
3.16 |
4.17 |
| Relations with other constituencies |
2.98 |
2.84 |
3.83 |
| Oversight of corporate strategy |
4.23 |
4.26 |
4.33 |
| Deal approval |
3.16 |
3.11 |
3.50 |
| Portfolio management |
2.77 |
2.76 |
3.33 |
| Source: Leading the Enterprise
2007TM, FPL Advisory Group |
| |
| Most Important Attributes
for Potential REIT Board Members in 2007 |
Attribute
|
Average
Score (1 to 5 scale) |
All
REIT
Respondents |
REIT
Executives |
REIT
Directors |
| Industry experience |
3.50 |
3.50 |
3.50 |
| CEO experience |
3.30 |
3.34 |
3.00 |
| Public company experience |
4.07 |
4.16 |
3.50 |
| Strategic planning experience |
3.73 |
3.71 |
3.83 |
| Government contract experience |
1.75 |
1.79 |
1.50 |
| Female |
3.02 |
3.08 |
2.67 |
| Minority |
2.89 |
2.92 |
2.67 |
| Legal experience |
1.75 |
1.66 |
2.33 |
| Professor/academic |
1.75 |
1.71 |
2.00 |
| Seniority in another industry |
3.07 |
3.11 |
2.83 |
| Prior board experience |
3.48 |
3.53 |
3.17 |
| Geographic diversity |
2.45 |
2.42 |
2.67 |
| Local community member |
1.91 |
1.87 |
2.17 |
| Wall Street/investment banking experience |
2.23 |
2.11 |
3.00 |
| Time & personal commitment |
4.13 |
4.16 |
4.00 |
Personal attributes (i.e.,
intelligence, integrity, personality) |
4.80 |
4.82 |
4.67 |
| Source:
Leading the Enterprise 2007TM, FPL Advisory
Group |
|
Bill Ferguson is co-chairman and co-CEO at FPL
Advisory Group.